Home / Events / Programme Events / Non Religious Identities In Policy And Practice
Programme Event
Senate House where the event was held
Non-Religious Identities in Policy and Practice
20 April 12
Friday 20 April 2012, Senate House, London
Scroll down to ‘Programme’ to access podcasts from this event.
Introduction
There has been growth in scholarly and popular interest in atheism, humanism and secularism in the UK in recent years, but conferences and seminars have tended to focus upon how to study ‘non-religion’ or debates with religion.
This one-day workshop sought to address the content of non-religious identities as they are lived and legislated, bringing together academics, humanists, atheists, secularists, the media, the third sector and other interested parties [see below for the list of participants], exploring the variety masked by such a broad label and addressing questions such as: if equalities legislation protects ‘religion or belief’, then where do non-religious people stand? What does non-religious practice look like? How might non-religious identities be taken on their own terms? It was sponsored by the Jacobs Foundation-funded Young Atheists Research Project and AHRC/ESRC Religion and Society Programme.
As a growing body of research is showing, the label ‘non-religious’ covers a spectrum of things. It is being limited academically to include groups and people to whom their difference from religion is of primary importance. Yet, non-religious identities can be and are being understood much more broadly than this in policy and legal contexts, which became evident from the second session of the day. In recent England and Wales equalities legislation ‘religion or belief’ and a ‘lack of belief’ are protected characteristics. One frequently comes across the phrase ‘all faiths and none’ in policy and consultation documents, with little consideration as to what the ‘and none’ might comprise.
The workshop underlined the need for cross-disciplinary work in the area and moderate voices to be heard to a greater extent in public debate. Legal and popular understandings seem to be lagging behind how people live their religious and non-religious identities (the latter seeming not to make sense without reference to the former) and consequent social scientific analyses of the relationship between belief, behaviour and emotion. The solution may well not be to proliferate ‘religion or belief’ protections. The day certainly highlighted what a dynamic and diverse area this is, with scope for much more research.
We are very grateful to radio producer Norman Winter who recorded and wrote up the day for us. The list of presentations is below with links to the podcast and his summary of each talk available. So please do listen to and read more about the day [the full report is available to download at the bottom of this page].
Dr Rebecca Catto, Lancaster, 6 June 2012
Programme (including links to podcasts)
Scene Setting
ANDREW COPSON (Chief Executive, British Humanist Association) – Opening address
DAVID VOAS (University of Essex) – Setting the statistical scene
Law and Policy (Domestic and International)
PETER JONES (Newcastle University)
MALEIHA MALIK (King’s College London)
STELLA COGLIEVINA (University of Insubria)
DAVID POLLOCK (President, European Humanist Federation)
RUSSELL SANDBERG (Cardiff University) [in his absence on the day Rebecca Catto summarised his paper for the audience]
Non-Religious Identities as Lived I
SARIYA CONTRACTOR, TRISTRAM HOOLEY, NICKI MOORE and PAUL WELLER (University of Derby) – ‘Discrimination, Equality and the ‘Non-Religious’: Reported Experiences and Perspectives from Two Recent Research Projects’ PART 1 and PART 2
MATTHEW ENGELKE (LSE) – ethnography with the British Humanist Association
Non-Religious Identities as Lived II
ANDREW BROWN (Guardian “Comment is Free” Belief) – Stimulating and managing online debates
Feedback and Concluding Discussion
LOIS LEE (founder of Nonreligion and Secularity Research Network) – rapporteur
Participants:
Ainsworth, Peta |
Lancaster University |
Aston, Katie |
Goldsmiths, University of London |
Baggini, Julian |
|
Brown, Andrew |
The Guardian |
Catto, Rebecca |
Lancaster University |
Coglievina, Stella |
King’s College London |
Contractor, Sariya |
University of Derby |
Copson, Andrew |
British Humanist Association |
Cotter, Chris |
NSRN |
Dhaliwal, Pavan |
British Humanist Association |
Eccles, Janet |
Lancaster University |
Engelke, Matthew |
London School of Economics |
Goddard, Elizabeth |
|
Haycock, Ellie |
AHS |
Hooley, Tristram |
University of Derby |
Jones, Peter |
Newcastle University |
Lee, Lois |
Goldsmiths, University of London |
Leigh, Ian |
Durham University |
Malik, Maleiha |
King’s College London |
Massey-Chase, Becca |
3FF |
Mumford, Lorna |
University College London |
Pearce, Brian |
The Inter Faith Network for the UK |
Pollock, David |
European Humanist Federation |
Vautier, Jess |
AHS |
Voas, David |
University of Essex |
Wallis, Simeon |
University of Warwick |
Winter, Norman |
Radio Producer |
- Read Andrew Brown’s write up of the day on The Guradian Comment is Free (26 April 2012): http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2012/apr/26/persistence-superstition-irreligious-britain
- Read Matthew Engelke’s piece ‘What is a good death? Ritual, whether religious or not, still counts’ (14 May 2012) commissioned for The Guardian Comment is Free following the workshop: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2012/may/14/good-death-ritual-religious
Non-Religious Identities in Policy & Practice Workshop 20 April 2012 Report.pdf
To subscribe to our mail list please e-mail:
p.ainsworth@lancaster.ac.uk